JOSÉ ANTONIO CARAV@CA First Edition: June 2022
It must be taken into
account that one of the most serious mistakes made by ufologists has been to
consider that the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH)5 was the only, as well as evident and
logical, solution to the enigma before even having all the data and information
on the table to, obviously, be able to form a more accurate idea of the
paradigm at hand. Also, to top off this initial failed approach, almost all
research has been conducted, oriented and even sweetened to “prove”
the validity of the visit of alien beings to our planet over any other proposal
that dared to stand up to this seductive idea. Trampling over any clue or
element that could call into question this belief.
…
There are a series of complex questions that have never crossed the
minds of most ufologists: how can there be so many different types of crew
members; why don’t flying saucers leave traces in all landings; why in some
incidents the occupant of the UFO can speak our language perfectly and in
others he babbles in an incomprehensible language; why do the alleged
extraterrestrials repeat certain actions ad nauseam over and over again in
front of witnesses? Why do we have such different descriptions of the
same apparent phenomenon; why do aliens wear scuba suits in one event and not
in others; why are many close encounters absurd and nonsensical; where does
this link between paranormal phenomena and flying saucers comes from; why does
the ufological paradigm have so many things in common with our human society;
why do UFOs have so many colored lights if they want to go unnoticed ?
Andres Gomez Serrano, 19 in his book UFOs: 50 years of
research in the Campo de Gibraltar (1997), almost poetically stated that
UFOs:
Thousands of witnesses (millions of them) have seen them, photographed them,
filmed them, chased them (with fighter planes), and they have even been shot
from the ground and from the air with all kinds of weapons, including missiles,
both day and night. Governments are still silent, do not know, do not respond.
The most impenetrable mystery accompanied by a persistent silence hangs over
this lurid affair. In spite of the fact that in their possession -we only
suppose-, there are ample and voluminous dossiers classifying them as “Top
Secret or top secret classified matter”.
…
The researcher Félix Arés de Blas stated that: “The UFO phenomenon is a
multiple phenomenon. There is a physical phenomenon. There is a physical
phenomenon and there is a mythical phenomenon. They are totally differentiated
realities, autonomous worlds with few contacts between them. The UFO myth
exists and has a life of its own independent of the physical UFO, or with very
little relation to the physical UFO.42
…
Do you understand now, dear reader, why one premise prevails over the
other, who is going to admit the reality of these encounters 63, and is it logical that a partial and
biased reading of the data is preferred? One thing is clear. The more
information about the UFO phenomenon we have, the more confusion64. The closer the proximity, the more
the anarchy in the data . And, therefore, our reason must “leave the ship”
before facing the deep study of the case reports.
From the UFO emerged a flying humanoid that approached before the astonished witnesses to get behind the wheel of their car (Carav@ca Archive).
JAC
