Icebutik
  • Home
  • World
  • Anomalies
  • Unexplained
  • Phenomena
  • Weird
  • Odd News
  • Mysteries
  • Contact us
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Icebutik
  • Home
  • World

    Israel protests: PM Netanyahu delays legal reforms after day of strikes

    March 27, 2023

    Africas Dark Road to Democracy — Global Issues

    March 27, 2023

    Russia may demand compensation over Nord Stream blasts: Diplomat | Russia-Ukraine war News

    March 27, 2023

    Protests Erupt in Israel After Netanyahu Fires Defense Minister

    March 27, 2023

    Israel defence minister fired in legal reform row

    March 26, 2023
  • Anomalies
  • Unexplained
  • Phenomena
  • Weird
  • Odd News
  • Mysteries
  • Contact us
Icebutik
Home»Anomalies»The Loch Ness Monster Absolutely Can’t Be an Eel, Study Shows
Anomalies

The Loch Ness Monster Absolutely Can’t Be an Eel, Study Shows

SteinarBy SteinarJanuary 30, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


The Loch Ness Monster Absolutely Can’t Be an EelKeystone – Getty Images

  • A few years ago, scientists said the Loch Ness Monster most closely resembled a giant eel.

  • Now, a new study suggests it’s “highly improbable” for giant eels to match the reported sightings of the Loch Ness Monster.

  • There may still be eels in the Loch Ness—just not the super big ones that could have been Nessie.

For centuries, people have searched for the mythical beast known as the Loch Ness Monster. “Nessie,” as she’s known, is supposedly nestled somewhere in the vast Loch Ness in the Scottish Highlands, and she’s appeared enough over the years, however briefly, to have registered over 1,000 reported sightings.

Until a few years ago, no scientific studies yielded any solid evidence of the Loch Ness Monster, who skeptics and believers alike have labeled as everything from a shark to a tree to a dinosaur. But in 2019, researchers from New Zealand revealed that they had used a scientific technique called environmental DNA collection to finally determine the truth about the strange species.

The scientists combed Loch Ness for hair, scales, and poop from all kinds of creatures swimming in the lake—fish, mammals, and other ancient cryptids—to collect DNA. After analyzing 500 million sequences from 250 water samples, the scientists couldn’t find traces of sharks, catfish, or dinosaurs, but they did find a “very significant amount of eel DNA,” according to lead researcher Neil Gemmell, a geneticist at the University of Otago in New Zealand.

And so since then, that’s more or less been the official party line: the Loch Ness monster is probably, possibly, maybe the European eel—Anguilla anguilla, “a snakelike, migrating fish which can reach almost give feet in length, but generally averages 2.5 to 3 feet,” per Mysterious Universe.

But not so fast! Now, a Pittsburgh-based data analyst named Floe Foxon is using cold, hard stats to refute the generally accepted “eel hypothesis” with a new, non-peer-reviewed study of his own, which appears in bioRxiv, the biology preprint server. After analyzing data from 129 A. anguilla eels caught in Loch Ness between 1970 and 1971 and comparing the numbers with European eel catch data from lakes in Belgium, Foxon has thrown some cold water on the “it’s just a giant eel” explanation.

Yes, Foxon says, the odds of finding a 1-meter eel in Loch Ness—1 in 50,000—are pretty good—“and so some eels may account for purported sightings of somewhat large animals at the loch surface,” he writes. But many Nessie sightings over the years have pegged her size at much bigger than that; most reports place her closer to 6 meters long, which just doesn’t jibe with the existing data, says Foxon.

“Larger eels upwards of 6 meters are highly improbable,” he writes. “Therefore, ‘super’ eels are an unlikely explanation for eyewitness reports of the very largest alleged animals.”

Foxon continues:

“Thus, while large eels may account for some eyewitness sightings of large, animate objects rising to the loch surface, they are unlikely to account for sightings of extraordinarily large animals, which may instead be accounted for by wave phenomena, the occasional stray mammal, or other.”

Alas, the scientific search for Nessie’s true nature presses on.

You Might Also Like



Source link

Related

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Previous ArticleWHO updates list of medicines governments should stockpile in case of a nuclear emergency
Next Article Nations fight back — Global Issues
Steinar
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest

Related Posts

Secret Tunnels and D.U.M.B.s – by The Paranormalist

March 27, 2023

NASA Is Tracking a Huge, Growing Anomaly in Earth’s Magnetic Field : ScienceAlert

March 26, 2023

Scientists Are Preparing to Create a Traversable Quantum Wormhole

March 26, 2023

Aliens could be found in dust, scientists say

March 25, 2023

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Categories
  • Anomalies (1,081)
  • Icebutik Store (271)
  • Odd News (1,722)
  • Unexplained-mysteries (860)
  • Unexplained-phenomena (1,736)
  • Weird (10)
  • World (1,541)

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

Loading
Latest Posts

Cernunnos – The Enigmatic Antlered God of the Ancient Celts

March 28, 2023

Soccer star on Becky G cheating rumors: ’10 minute lapse in judgment resulted in an extortion plot’

March 27, 2023

Secret Tunnels and D.U.M.B.s – by The Paranormalist

March 27, 2023
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
© 2023 Designed by icebutik

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.