Icebutik
  • Home
  • World
  • Anomalies
  • Unexplained
  • Phenomena
  • Weird
  • Odd News
  • Mysteries
  • Contact us
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Icebutik
  • Home
  • World

    Monkeypox: Israel and Switzerland confirm cases

    May 22, 2022

    UN chief calls to ‘build a shared future for all life’ — Global Issues

    May 22, 2022

    Erdogan speaks to Stoltenberg over Finland, Sweden NATO bid | NATO News

    May 22, 2022

    ‘I Want to Reset My Brain’: Female Veterans Turn to Psychedelic Therapy

    May 21, 2022

    Spain lifts Covid ban on unvaccinated travellers

    May 21, 2022
  • Anomalies
  • Unexplained
  • Phenomena
  • Weird
  • Odd News
  • Mysteries
  • Contact us
Icebutik
Home»Anomalies»Whitley Strieber, “Them” – Skunkworks
Anomalies

Whitley Strieber, “Them” – Skunkworks

SteinarBy SteinarMarch 12, 2022No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Here, I continue my commentary on the plenary sessions of Rice University’s Archives of the Impossible conference. My notes on Jeffrey Kripal’s opening remarks and Jacques Vallée’s keynote address can be read, here, while those on Diana Pasulka’s plenary address are viewable, here.

Friday, I missed Leslie Kean’s plenary talk, “Physical Impossibilities: From UFOs to Materializations”, but I was eager to catch Whitley Strieber’s, not only because of his reputation, but moreso because he has co-authored a book with Jeffrey Kripal, The Super Natural.

Strieber, being a writer, delivered a relatively eloquent talk, in a mellifluous, cadenced voice. He began, after a series of gracious, thoughtful acknowledgements, confirming the notion Jeffrey Kripal laid out yesterday, that the paranormal is a unified field, underlining the unity of the Visitor experience and the mystery of death, stressing the phenomenon demands to be approached “holistically” and interdisciplinarily.

The body of his discourse was the presentation and analysis of one of the many letters he and his wife received in the wake of Strieber’s publishing Communion, a large number of which are now housed in the Archives of the Impossible. Strieber proposed to read the story the letter related according to the myth of Ariadne, Theseus, and the Minotaur: the role of Theseus is played by the family who experience an encounter with the Visitors; the Labyrinth is our dark, confused world; the Minotaur is fear and anger; Ariadne is the consciousness behind and controlling the Visitor experience; and the thread, the process of human perception, the way it domesticates the wildly strange, tempering fear with curiosity. He managed to unfold the letter’s account according to his proposed schema in an easy to follow manner, however unconvincing….

What struck me was Strieber’s stressing how the Visitor experience “is a communication of a kind”, related to the myths of all cultures. Indeed, it’s because Strieber perceives this link between the experience and myths that he ventures to read the letter the way he does, going as far as to claim that an acquaintance with myth is necessary to understand Contact and “the grammar of Communion.” In this regard, Strieber seems to echo Vallée’s contention in his keynote address, that the phenomenon “is not a system but a metasystem”. Someone not unfamiliar with the developments of last century’s literary theory might say it is a language (myth).

Ironically, however much Strieber is at pains to stress the pertinence of our mythological inheritance in understanding Contact, his own acquaintance with the myth he deploys is weak. It’s not the case that Ariadne saves Theseus from the Minotaur by guiding him out of the Labyrinth with her thread, but that her thread enables him to navigate the Labyrinth in order to slay the Minotaur and emerge again. Strieber is correct that Theseus abandons Ariadne after his exploit, but says that she weds Dionysus “the god of joy” and thereby becomes holy, a becoming holy (whole, complete), Strieber maintains, being the “inner aim of Contact”. But by what warrant does Strieber identify Dionysus/Bacchus with “joy”?…

Not only does he betray only a loose acquaintance with the myth he would employ, but, I would argue, he confuses myth with myths. That is, if the Visitor/Contact phenomenon operates at a mythological level, from the point of view of structural mythology, it is not because of how its various narratives might echo other narratives, but because of its structure, which is that of myth. Myth, like language, is a form not a substance. He does seem to unconsciously grasp this approach, when he draws attention to various actions in the letter he analyzes (and, no!, he does not “deconstruct” it!) when he remarks various actions that occur along the vertical axis: one Visitor leaps from a water silo, they appear in the trees, the family ascends to the second story of their home to get a better view of the beings, etc., an observation typical of a structural analysis of myth or narrative. Strieber’s exegesis of the letter is illuminating but, ironically, despite the allegorical machinery he brings to bear….

One must wonder, too, if he were present during Vallée’s presentation and his warnings concerning the truths intelligence agencies relate, as Strieber at one point emphasized how the U.S. government recently admitted that the leaked Tic-Tac and Gimbal videos depicted vehicles of unknown origin….

So, like Jacques Vallée’s keynote address, Whitley Strieber’s contribution, though smoothly delivered and containing some provocative insights, fails to persuade because of, ironically, its weak grasp of essential aspects of its own argument, here the very myth he would use to construct his discourse, if not mythology as such itself….

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Published by Bryan Sentes

I am a scholar and poet based in Montreal, Canada, where I teach in the English Department of Dawson College.
View all posts by Bryan Sentes



Source link

Related

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Previous ArticleBill Maher: Why Putin invaded Ukraine under Biden, not Trump, is ‘worth asking’
Next Article Ukrainian Minister Has Turned Digital Tools Into Modern Weapons of War
Steinar
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest

Related Posts

Plagued By Terrifying Dreams, Thieves Return Stolen Statues To Temple In India – Coast2Coast AM

May 22, 2022

70-year-old astronomy photos may be clues to alien visitors — study

May 22, 2022

Voyager is sending ‘impossible data’ back to Nasa from the edge of the Solar System

May 21, 2022

Experts uncover new series of Stonehenge mystery monuments that could reveal secrets of the past

May 20, 2022

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Categories
  • Anomalies (319)
  • Icebutik Store (271)
  • Odd News (485)
  • Unexplained-mysteries (239)
  • Unexplained-phenomena (467)
  • Weird (10)
  • World (534)

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

Latest Posts

Monkeypox: Israel and Switzerland confirm cases

May 22, 2022

Terrell: Joe Biden ‘uses Black people’ in his ‘game of race division’

May 22, 2022

Mystery as NASA investigates anomalous Voyager 1 telemetry

May 22, 2022
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
© 2022 Designed by icebutik

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.