Icebutik
  • Home
  • World
  • Anomalies
  • Unexplained
  • Phenomena
  • Weird
  • Odd News
  • Mysteries
  • Contact us
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Icebutik
  • Home
  • World

    Russia Reluctantly Agrees to a Two-Month Extension — Global Issues

    March 22, 2023

    Sri Lanka receives first tranche of IMF bailout, says president | International Monetary Fund

    March 22, 2023

    Putin: China plan could end war, but Ukraine and West not ready for peace

    March 21, 2023

    Healthy forests, healthy planet, healthy humans — Global Issues

    March 21, 2023

    Finch, de Kock unveiled on Major League Cricket draft day | Cricket News

    March 21, 2023
  • Anomalies
  • Unexplained
  • Phenomena
  • Weird
  • Odd News
  • Mysteries
  • Contact us
Icebutik
Home»Unexplained-mysteries»Zoo elephant ‘is not a person’ court rules
Unexplained-mysteries

Zoo elephant ‘is not a person’ court rules

SteinarBy SteinarJune 15, 2022No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Natural World

June 15, 2022 |  9 comments


Should elephants be classed as people ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 Geir Kiste

An elephant named ‘Happy’ has been the subject of a legal battle to have her released back into the wild.

The 51-year-old elephant, who now resides at Bronx Zoo in New York, was actually born in the wild in Thailand in the 1970s before being captured and brought to the United States.

In recent months she has been the subject of a court case brought by the Nonhuman Rights Project which maintains that it is illegal to hold the animal captive because she is sufficiently emotionally intelligent to be considered a person and deserves basic human rights.

The ultimate aim of the case was to have the elephant released from captivity.

Sadly for Happy, however, the court ruled that the legal principles which protect humans from unlawful incarceration do not apply to elephants.

“While no one disputes the impressive capabilities of elephants, we reject petitioner’s arguments that it is entitled to seek the remedy of habeas corpus on Happy’s behalf,” wrote Chief Judge Janet DiFiore.

“Habeas corpus is a procedural vehicle intended to secure the liberty rights of human beings who are unlawfully restrained, not nonhuman animals.”

Source: BBC News | Comments (9)

Tags:

Elephant

Related

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Previous ArticleChina may be spying on you through your coffee maker, expert says
Next Article Aliens Could Have Visited Earth, Russia Investigating UFOs
Steinar
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest

Related Posts

‘Lake monster’ captured on camera in Madin Dam, Mexico

March 22, 2023

Scotland’s Cawdor Castle said to be home to ghostly woman with no hands

March 21, 2023

USAF once investigated case of ‘alien’ who made pancakes for witness

March 21, 2023

Aftermath of Notre Dame fire continues to reveal its secrets

March 20, 2023

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Categories
  • Anomalies (1,070)
  • Icebutik Store (271)
  • Odd News (1,699)
  • Unexplained-mysteries (849)
  • Unexplained-phenomena (1,712)
  • Weird (10)
  • World (1,524)

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

Loading
Latest Posts

Thutmose III, the Famed Warrior King of Ancient Egypt

March 22, 2023

Russia Reluctantly Agrees to a Two-Month Extension — Global Issues

March 22, 2023

Lead prosecutor who helped convict Derek Chauvin of murder appointed judge in Hennepin County

March 22, 2023
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
© 2023 Designed by icebutik

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.